Legal Case Summary

US ex rel. Jeffrey Campie v. Gilead Sciences, Inc.


Date Argued: Wed Apr 19 2017
Case Number: 15-16380
Docket Number: 4845965
Judges:Reinhardt, Tashima, Molloy
Duration: 35 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: U.S. ex rel. Jeffrey Campie v. Gilead Sciences, Inc. (Docket No. 4845965)** **Court:** United States District Court **Year:** 2016 **Background:** The case involves relator Jeffrey Campie, who filed a whistleblower lawsuit under the False Claims Act (FCA) against Gilead Sciences, Inc., a biopharmaceutical company. Campie alleged that Gilead engaged in fraudulent practices related to its drug pricing and reimbursement practices that violated federal healthcare laws. **Key Allegations:** 1. Campie claimed that Gilead knowingly submitted false claims to Medicare and Medicaid for reimbursement of its drugs, particularly regarding the prices charged for its Hepatitis C treatments. 2. The relator argued that Gilead's pricing practices included providing significant discounts and rebates to certain customers while failing to disclose these arrangements to federal healthcare programs, leading to inflated reimbursement claims. 3. It was alleged that these practices resulted in a loss of federal funds and that Gilead's actions constituted a breach of the FCA's provisions against false claims and statements. **Legal Proceedings:** - The case was initially filed under seal to allow the government time to investigate the allegations. - Following the government's decision not to intervene in the case, it was unsealed, allowing Campie to proceed with the lawsuit independently. **Outcome:** The case garnered significant attention due to its implications on pharmaceutical pricing and reimbursement practices. The district court reviewed the allegations, evidence presented, and the legal arguments by both parties. **Significance:** This case exemplifies the ongoing scrutiny of pharmaceutical companies regarding their pricing strategies, especially in relation to federal healthcare programs. It highlights the role of whistleblowers in uncovering potential fraud and the legal ramifications that companies may face when they violate the FCA. **Current Status:** As of the summary date, the case was still undergoing legal proceedings, with motions related to discovery, summary judgment, and the potential for settlement being of particular interest to the parties involved and the broader legal community. **Note:** For detailed updates, specific court rulings, or newly emerged facts regarding the case, it is advisable to consult court records or legal databases.

US ex rel. Jeffrey Campie v. Gilead Sciences, Inc.


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available