Legal Case Summary

Utstarcom v. Starent Networks


Date Argued: Tue Apr 03 2007
Case Number: 146440
Docket Number: 2599820
Judges:Not available
Duration: 36 minutes
Court Name: Federal Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: UTStarcom, Inc. v. Starent Networks Corp.** **Docket Number:** 2599820 **Court:** The specific court information may vary; it typically involves a federal or state court depending on the jurisdiction of the case. **Date:** The specific date of filing or judgment would need to be verified from court records. **Background:** UTStarcom, Inc. filed a lawsuit against Starent Networks Corp., alleging various claims related to patent infringement, breach of contract, or possibly unfair competition. This case stems from the competitive telecommunications industry, where both companies are known for their innovative technologies and solutions for network infrastructure. **Key Issues:** - **Patent Infringement:** The core of the dispute often revolves around the claim that Starent Networks infringed on one or more patents held by UTStarcom. The patents in question likely pertain to specific technologies used in networking equipment or telecommunications protocols. - **Breach of Contract:** If there were any prior agreements between the two companies, UTStarcom may also claim that Starent failed to adhere to specific contractual obligations. - **Trade Secrets or Confidential Information:** There may be allegations regarding the misuse of proprietary information that led to unfair competition. **Arguments:** - UTStarcom's arguments would focus on demonstrating how Starent Networks’ products or services infringe on their patented technology or violate contractual agreements. - Starent Networks may contend that the patents are invalid or not infringed upon, arguing that their technology is either original or in compliance with licensing agreements. **Outcomes:** - The case could result in several outcomes, including but not limited to: - A ruling in favor of UTStarcom, leading to potential damages awarded for loss of revenue, a cease-and-desist order against Starent, or an injunction preventing further infringement. - A ruling in favor of Starent Networks, which could lead to the dismissal of the charges and potentially claim for legal costs. - A settlement reached out of court, where both parties negotiate terms to resolve the dispute without further litigation. **Significance:** This case may have broader implications for the telecommunications industry, particularly regarding the enforcement of intellectual property rights, competition laws, and the dynamics between innovative companies in a rapidly evolving technological landscape. **Note:** For specific details regarding court rulings, it is advised to consult legal databases or the court's public record for the most accurate and updated information.

Utstarcom v. Starent Networks


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available