Legal Case Summary

Vaughn Archer v. Daniel Paramo


Date Argued: Thu Nov 15 2018
Case Number: 16-56464
Docket Number: 8198147
Judges:Parker, Gould, Murguia
Duration: 24 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Vaughn Archer v. Daniel Paramo** **Docket Number:** 8198147 **Court:** [Insert specific court name, e.g., United States District Court for the Southern District of California] **Date:** [Insert relevant dates, e.g., decision date, filing date] **Key Parties:** - **Plaintiff:** Vaughn Archer - **Defendant:** Daniel Paramo **Background:** Vaughn Archer initiated a legal action against Daniel Paramo, involving claims rooted in [insert relevant legal grounds, e.g., civil rights violations, negligence, etc.]. The specifics of the case arose from events, incidents, or circumstances that occurred on [insert relevant date], where Archer alleges [insert brief description of the incident or complaint]. **Key Issues:** The primary legal issues presented in the case include: 1. [Insert Issue 1, e.g., whether the actions of Daniel Paramo violated constitutional rights]. 2. [Insert Issue 2, if applicable, e.g., whether there was sufficient basis for the claim of negligence]. 3. [Any additional issues relevant to the case]. **Arguments:** - **Plaintiff's Argument:** Vaughn Archer contends that [insert key arguments made by the plaintiff, including legal statutes or precedents cited]. - **Defendant's Argument:** Daniel Paramo argues that [insert key arguments made by the defendant, including defenses raised, such as qualified immunity, lack of jurisdiction, etc.]. **Court's Analysis:** The court analyzed the arguments presented by both parties, focusing on [insert key aspects of the court's reasoning]. The court examined [insert relevant laws, precedents, or evidentiary standards that the court applied]. **Outcome:** The court ultimately [insert the decision—e.g., ruled in favor of Archer, dismissed the case, granted summary judgment, etc.], citing [insert reasons for the decision]. The ruling had implications for [insert potential implications on law, future cases, or parties involved]. **Conclusion:** The case of Vaughn Archer v. Daniel Paramo serves as a significant example of [insert brief commentary on the importance or impact of the case]. The legal principles established in this case may influence [mention any applicable future cases or legal standards]. **Note:** For full details, parties should consult legal databases or court records for complete case opinions and filings.

Vaughn Archer v. Daniel Paramo


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available