Legal Case Summary

Waimea v. Thielen


Date Argued: Fri Nov 02 2007
Case Number: 06-16977
Docket Number: 7853779
Judges:O'scannlain, Tashima, Smith
Duration: 28 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Waimea v. Thielen, Docket No. 7853779** **Court:** [Specify Court, e.g., Supreme Court of Hawaii] **Date:** [Specify Date of Decision] **Judges:** [List Names of Judges] **Parties:** - **Appellant:** Waimea - **Appellee:** Thielen **Background:** The case involves a dispute between Waimea and Thielen concerning [briefly describe the nature of the dispute, e.g., land use, environmental issues, administrative decisions, etc.]. Waimea has filed an appeal against Thielen, [include any pertinent details about the parties, such as their roles or positions related to the case]. **Facts:** The primary facts of the case include [summarize key facts leading to the appeal, including any relevant actions taken by both parties, events, and decisions made by lower courts or administrative bodies]. Specifically, [mention important dates or events, like permits issued, violations claimed, etc.]. **Issues:** The central legal issues in this case are: 1. [Identify the first legal issue or question raised by Waimea in the appeal] 2. [Identify the second legal issue, if applicable] **Arguments:** - **Appellant (Waimea):** Waimea argues that [summarize the main arguments of the appellant, emphasizing key legal points and precedents cited]. They contend that [mention any statutory or constitutional bases for the appeal]. - **Appellee (Thielen):** Thielen argues that [summarize the main arguments of the appellee, countering the points raised by Waimea]. Thielen maintains that [highlight any defenses or legal standards they presented]. **Decision:** The court [state the decision of the court, such as affirming or reversing the lower court’s ruling]. The court held that [summarize the court’s reasoning and legal principles applied in reaching its conclusion]. [Include any specific instructions or actions ordered by the court, if applicable.] **Significance:** This case is significant because [explain the broader implications of the decision, such as its impact on state law, precedential value, or effects on future cases]. It illustrates [mention any key themes or insights relevant to the legal field]. **Conclusion:** In conclusion, Waimea v. Thielen serves as an important case regarding [reiterate the key issues and legal principles established by the court’s decision]. The ruling demonstrates [summarize any final thoughts about the case's significance or the state of the law moving forward]. **Note:** This summary is based on fictional details, as specific facts and context of the actual case were not provided. Please insert actual information regarding the case for an accurate summary.

Waimea v. Thielen


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available