Legal Case Summary

Walter v. Pike County


Date Argued: Wed Jun 10 2009
Case Number: 146440
Docket Number: 2602031
Judges:Not available
Duration: 51 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Walter v. Pike County (Docket No. 2602031)** **Court:** [Specify the court, e.g., Circuit Court, County Court] **Date:** [Specify the date of the ruling or filing] **Parties Involved:** - **Plaintiff:** Walter [First Name or Initial, if available] - **Defendant:** Pike County **Background:** The case of Walter v. Pike County involves a legal dispute between the plaintiff, Walter, and the local government entity, Pike County. The nature of the case revolves around [briefly describe the subject matter, e.g., zoning issues, personal injury claims, discrimination, etc.], which has raised questions regarding [mention legal principles or statutes relevant to the case]. **Key Facts:** - Walter is [describe the role of Walter in the case, e.g., a resident, property owner, etc.]. - Pike County is [describe the county's role or actions that led to the dispute]. - The core issue stems from [outline the events leading to the lawsuit, e.g., an action taken by the county that Walter contests, such as an ordinance, denial of a permit, etc.]. **Legal Issues:** The primary legal questions addressed in this case include: 1. [Issue 1: e.g., Whether Pike County’s action was lawful under state law.] 2. [Issue 2: e.g., Whether procedural due process was violated in the county’s decision.] 3. [Any additional issues relevant to the case.] **Court's Findings:** The court evaluated the evidence presented by both parties, including [mention any significant evidence, testimonies, or documents]. The court ultimately found that: - [Summarize the key findings of the court concerning each legal issue]. - [Include whether the court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, defendant, or if it was a partial ruling]. **Conclusion:** The ruling in Walter v. Pike County has implications for [briefly discuss the broader implications of the decision, e.g., local governance, property rights, or public policy]. The case highlights [mention any significant legal precedent or principles established]. **Next Steps:** [Optional: indicate any subsequent actions, such as appeals or further proceedings if applicable]. Please let me know if there are any specific details you would like to include or if there is a different focus you'd prefer for the summary!

Walter v. Pike County


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available