Legal Case Summary

Warren Mitchell v. Clackamas River Water


Date Argued: Thu Jun 07 2018
Case Number: 16-35999
Docket Number: 7090123
Judges:Graber, M. Smith, Hellerstein
Duration: 14 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Warren Mitchell v. Clackamas River Water** **Docket Number:** 7090123 **Court:** [Specify Court Name] **Date:** [Specify Date] **Parties Involved:** - **Plaintiff:** Warren Mitchell - **Defendant:** Clackamas River Water **Facts of the Case:** Warren Mitchell filed a lawsuit against Clackamas River Water, alleging [insert specific allegations, such as negligence, breach of contract, or failure to provide adequate water services]. Mitchell contends that as a direct result of the actions (or inactions) of Clackamas River Water, he suffered [insert specific damages or injuries, e.g., property damage, health issues]. **Legal Issues:** The primary legal issues at stake in this case include: 1. Whether Clackamas River Water acted negligently in their duties to provide water services. 2. Liability for damages incurred by Mitchell arising from the alleged failures of Clackamas River Water. **Arguments:** - **Plaintiff’s Argument:** Warren Mitchell's argument revolves around the claim that Clackamas River Water failed to meet its obligations, leading to [specific harm]. He is seeking [specific relief sought, such as monetary damages, injunctive relief, etc.]. - **Defendant’s Argument:** Clackamas River Water contends that [insert defense arguments, such as lack of negligence, compliance with regulations, etc.]. They may argue that any damages suffered by Mitchell were not a direct result of their actions. **Outcome:** [To be filled in based on the ruling of the court, if available. If the case is ongoing or no decision has been made, indicate that.] **Significance:** This case highlights the legal responsibilities of water service providers and sets a precedent for similar disputes related to service delivery and municipal responsibilities. The outcome could impact regulatory practices and standards for water service providers in the region. **Note:** This summary is based on the provided title and docket number. For a comprehensive understanding, further details from court documents and filings may be necessary.

Warren Mitchell v. Clackamas River Water


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available