Case Summary
**Case Summary: Washington v. Lampert, Docket No. 7858175**
**Court:** Washington State Court
**Filing Date:** [Specific date not provided in prompt]
### Background:
The case of Washington v. Lampert involved a legal dispute that arose under Washington state law. The parties in this case included the petitioner, Washington (the state), and the respondent, Lampert. The details of the conflict centered around issues pertinent to the interpretation of state statutes and the application of law to the specific circumstances presented.
### Key Issues:
1. **Legal Interpretation:** The primary legal question involved the interpretation of relevant state statutes that are at the heart of the dispute. The court needed to determine the scope and applicability of these laws.
2. **Factual Disputes:** Both parties presented differing accounts and interpretations of the facts surrounding the case. The resolution of these factual disputes was crucial for the court's decision.
### Arguments:
- **Petitioner (Washington):** The state argued that its interpretation of the law was correct and that prior rulings supported its position. The state likely presented evidence and precedent aimed at establishing the validity of its claims.
- **Respondent (Lampert):** The respondent contended that the state's interpretation was overly broad or misapplied, asserting that it contradicted previously established legal principles. Lampert's arguments focused on the specifics of his case, including any potential defenses or justifications under the law.
### Decision:
The court ultimately rendered a decision based on its interpretation of the law and the facts presented during the hearings. The ruling outlined the court's reasoning, including any statutory references and precedents that informed its judgment.
### Outcome:
The outcome of the case held significance for both the parties involved and potentially for broader legal principles concerning the relevant area of law. The court's ruling could set a precedent for future cases with similar legal questions.
### Conclusion:
Washington v. Lampert illustrates the complexities of legal interpretation and the importance of factual evidence in judicial proceedings. The case highlights the ongoing interplay between state statutes and individual rights, contributing to the evolving landscape of Washington state law. Further details, including the specific findings and implications of the court's ruling, would be found in the full court opinion accompanying the case docket.
(Note: This summary is based on a hypothetical framework since specific details about the case, such as the nature of the dispute and the court’s decision, were not provided in the prompt.)