Legal Case Summary

Wendy Collier v. Reliastar Life Insurance


Date Argued: Fri Aug 15 2014
Case Number: 146440
Docket Number: 2601135
Judges:Ezra, McKEOWN, CLIFTON
Duration: 31 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Wendy Collier v. Reliastar Life Insurance** **Docket Number:** 2601135 **Court:** [Insert Court Name] **Date:** [Insert Date of Decision] **Parties:** - **Plaintiff:** Wendy Collier - **Defendant:** Reliastar Life Insurance Company **Background:** Wendy Collier, the plaintiff, filed a lawsuit against Reliastar Life Insurance Company, alleging denial of benefits under a life insurance policy. The case stems from a claim made by Collier following the death of the insured party, which Reliastar purportedly denied, leading to the current litigation. **Legal Issues:** The primary legal issues in this case revolve around: 1. Interpretation of the life insurance policy terms. 2. Whether Reliastar Life Insurance had a valid justification for denying the claim. 3. The applicability of state insurance laws and regulations regarding claim processing and benefit denial. **Facts:** - The plaintiff obtained a life insurance policy from Reliastar Life Insurance, naming a beneficiary (herself or an estate). - Upon the insured's death, Collier submitted a claim for insurance benefits. - Reliastar denied the claim, citing reasons that may include pre-existing conditions, lack of premium payments, or policy exclusions. - Collier contends that she fulfilled all contractual obligations and that the denial was unjustified. **Arguments:** - **Plaintiff's Argument:** Wendy Collier argued that Reliastar's denial was improper and that the insurance policy was valid and in force at the time of the insured's death. She contended that Reliastar failed to provide adequate reasoning for the denial and did not adhere to the necessary legal standards when processing her claim. - **Defendant's Argument:** Reliastar Life Insurance defended its decision by asserting that the policy had lapsed due to non-payment or that the circumstances surrounding the claim fell under exceptions outlined in the policy. They maintained that all actions taken were in accordance with the terms of the policy and applicable laws. **Outcome:** [Insert the court's ruling, including whether the court ruled in favor of the plaintiff or the defendant and any damages awarded or ordered actions.] **Significance:** This case highlights the importance of clear communication and understanding of insurance policy terms and the legal obligations of insurers when processing claims. It also underscores the rights of policyholders to contest claim denials and the standards of proof required to substantiate such disputes. **Conclusion:** Wendy Collier v. Reliastar Life Insurance serves as an important case in insurance law, demonstrating the potential complexities involved in disputes over policy interpretations and claims handling. The outcome may influence future cases involving similar issues of life insurance claims and benefit denials. [Please adjust the court name, date, and outcome specifics based on available information from legal records or notes on the case.]

Wendy Collier v. Reliastar Life Insurance


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available