Case Summary
**Case Summary: William Blackford v. Oregon Board of Parole**
**Docket Number:** 2601950
**Court:** Oregon Court of Appeals
**Date:** [Insert Date Here, as applicable]
**Background:**
William Blackford filed a case against the Oregon Board of Parole, challenging the Board's decision regarding his parole eligibility. The issues at stake primarily revolved around the procedural aspects of the parole process and the application of relevant statutes and regulations governing parole eligibility in Oregon.
**Facts:**
William Blackford was convicted of [insert relevant crime] and sentenced to [insert sentence details]. After serving a portion of his sentence, Blackford became eligible for parole. However, the Oregon Board of Parole determined that he did not meet the criteria for parole at the scheduled hearing, citing [insert reasons provided by the Board].
**Legal Issues:**
The main legal issues in this case included:
1. Whether the Oregon Board of Parole properly applied the statutory criteria for determining parole eligibility.
2. Whether Blackford was afforded due process in the parole hearing process.
3. Whether the Board's decision was supported by substantial evidence.
**Ruling:**
The Oregon Court of Appeals assessed the Board's procedural adherence to statutory requirements and evaluated the evidence presented during the parole hearing. The Court found [insert the court's findings related to due process, the application of the law by the Board, and the sufficiency of the evidence]. Ultimately, the Court ruled that [summarize the Court's decision, whether it affirmed or reversed the Board's decision].
**Impact:**
This ruling has significant implications for parole procedures in Oregon. It emphasizes the importance of due process and adherence to statutory guidelines by parole boards, ensuring that individuals receive fair treatment throughout the parole application process.
**Conclusion:**
William Blackford v. Oregon Board of Parole highlights critical aspects of parole eligibility and the rights of individuals in the correctional system. This case serves as a reference point for similar disputes concerning the parole process and its adherence to legal standards in Oregon.
**Note:** Specific details regarding the crime, the Board's reasons for denial, and the Court's final ruling would need to be added for a complete summary, as this is a general template.