Legal Case Summary

William Hanback v. DRHI, Incorporated


Date Argued: Tue Mar 22 2016
Case Number: 15-1434
Docket Number: 3047375
Judges:Paul V. Niemeyer, Diana Gribbon Motz, Max O. Cogburn Jr.
Duration: 28 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Case Summary

### Case Summary: William Hanback v. DRHI, Incorporated **Docket Number:** 3047375 **Court:** [Specify the court, e.g., Circuit Court, Supreme Court] **Date:** [Specify the date of the decision] #### Parties Involved: - **Plaintiff:** William Hanback - **Defendant:** DRHI, Incorporated #### Background: William Hanback brought a lawsuit against DRHI, Incorporated, alleging [insert the nature of the claims—e.g., breach of contract, negligence, product liability, etc.]. The dispute arose from [provide a brief overview of the circumstances leading to the lawsuit, including any relevant facts about the parties and the events in question]. #### Key Issues: The primary legal questions addressed in the case included: - [List the key legal issues, e.g., Did DRHI, Incorporated breach any contractual obligations to Hanback? Were there reasonable safety standards met by the defendant?] - [Add any additional legal issues that were relevant to the case] #### Court’s Findings: The court examined evidence presented by both parties, including [describe types of evidence, such as witness testimonies, documents, expert opinions, etc.]. The court found that: - [Summarize the court's findings related to the issues in the case, including any specific legal standards applied.] - [State any significant facts that influenced the court's ruling.] #### Ruling: The court ruled in favor of [insert whether the ruling was in favor of the plaintiff or defendant], holding that: - [Detail the court's decision, including any awards for damages, orders for specific performance, or dismissals of claims.] #### Conclusion: This case highlighted important principles of [mention any legal principles or doctrines that were emphasized in the ruling]. The ruling may have implications for [discuss any broader impacts of the case on future legal interpretations or business practices]. **Note:** For complete information regarding the findings, rulings, and implications of this case, refer to the full court opinion and relevant legal analyses.

William Hanback v. DRHI, Incorporated


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available