Legal Case Summary

William Swoger v. Rare Coin Wholesalers


Date Argued: Thu Jun 04 2015
Case Number: S-14-529
Docket Number: 2662283
Judges:Lefkow, Smith, Smith
Duration: 22 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: William Swoger v. Rare Coin Wholesalers** **Docket Number:** 2662283 **Court:** [Specify Court if known] **Date:** [Specify Date if known] **Parties Involved:** - **Plaintiff:** William Swoger - **Defendant:** Rare Coin Wholesalers **Background:** William Swoger initiated legal proceedings against Rare Coin Wholesalers, claiming damages resulting from a transaction involving rare coins. The specifics of the dispute arise from allegations related to the sale and purchase of rare coins, including issues concerning misrepresentation, breach of contract, and possibly fraud. **Legal Issues:** The central legal issues in this case may revolve around: 1. Whether Rare Coin Wholesalers misrepresented the quality or value of the coins sold to Swoger. 2. Whether there was a breach of contract that affected the transaction. 3. The applicability of consumer protection laws in the sale of collectible items. **Arguments:** - **Plaintiff’s Arguments:** Swoger contends that he was defrauded by the representations made by Rare Coin Wholesalers, which led to financial loss. He seeks restitution for the difference between the value of the coins as represented and their actual value. - **Defendant’s Arguments:** Rare Coin Wholesalers may argue that all representations made were accurate and that Swoger conducted adequate due diligence prior to the purchase. **Outcome:** [If available, provide a brief description of the outcome of the case, including any judgments, settlements, or ongoing proceedings.] **Significance:** This case highlights important issues related to consumer rights in transactions involving collectibles and the responsibilities of retailers in accurately representing their products. It may set precedents for future cases involving similar claims in the rare coin market. **Next Steps:** Depending on the outcome, either party may appeal the decision or seek a resolution through negotiation. Further proceedings may also explore any potential remedies or compensatory measures for the plaintiff. *Note: The details in this summary are general and should be adjusted according to specific case facts and developments.*

William Swoger v. Rare Coin Wholesalers


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available