Legal Case Summary

Wilson v. Department of Financial and Professional Regulation


Date Argued: Tue May 07 2013
Case Number: 1-12-1509
Docket Number: 3084880
Judges:Not available
Duration: 29 minutes
Court Name: Appellate Court of Illinois

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Wilson v. Department of Financial and Professional Regulation (Docket No. 3084880)** **Court:** Illinois Appellate Court **Decided:** [Insert Date] **Citation:** [Insert Citation if available] **Background:** In the case of Wilson v. Department of Financial and Professional Regulation, the appellant, Wilson, challenged the decision made by the Illinois Department of Financial and Professional Regulation (IDFPR) regarding [specific issue, e.g., licensure, a disciplinary action, etc.]. Wilson's appeal was based on claims of improper procedures followed by the IDFPR and assertions that the agency's decisions were not supported by sufficient evidence. **Facts:** Wilson was subjected to regulatory scrutiny due to [details of the conduct or actions leading to the agency's intervention]. Following an investigation, the IDFPR issued a decision [describe the decision, such as revocation of license, imposition of fines, etc.], which Wilson contested. The Department's ruling was grounded on allegations that [summarize the allegations or reasons cited by the IDFPR for their action]. **Issue:** The primary issue before the appellate court was whether the IDFPR acted within its authority and followed proper procedures in reaching its decision against Wilson. Additionally, the court considered whether the evidence presented supported the agency’s conclusions. **Ruling:** The Illinois Appellate Court ruled in favor of [either Wilson or the IDFPR], finding that [summarize the court's decision]. The court assessed the procedural integrity of the IDFPR's actions and evaluated the sufficiency of the evidence presented during the administrative proceedings. **Significance:** This case is significant in the context of administrative law, as it underscores the balance between regulatory authority and the rights of individuals subjected to regulation. The ruling provides clarity on [specific legal principles or procedural standards reiterated by the court], which may impact future cases involving professional licensure and regulatory oversight. **Conclusion:** The outcome of Wilson v. Department of Financial and Professional Regulation highlights the importance of due process in regulatory actions and the necessity for regulatory bodies to base their decisions on comprehensive evidence. The court’s ruling may set a precedent for similar cases involving professional regulation in Illinois. [Note: For complete accuracy, please insert specific dates, citations, and detailed findings as necessary based on available legal documents or databases.]

Wilson v. Department of Financial and Professional Regulation


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available