Case Summary
**Case Summary: World Painting Company v. Costigan**
**Docket Number:** 3087309
**Court:** [Specify Court, if known]
**Date:** [Specify Date of Decision]
**Overview:**
This case involves a dispute between World Painting Company (hereinafter referred to as "Plaintiff") and Costigan (hereinafter referred to as "Defendant") concerning breach of contract and related claims arising from a painting service agreement.
**Facts:**
World Painting Company, a provider of painting and decorating services, entered into a contract with Costigan for specific painting services to be performed at Costigan’s residential property. The agreement outlined the scope of work, timeline, and payment terms.
As work commenced, the Plaintiff claims it encountered various obstacles that were not disclosed by the Defendant, leading to delays and increased costs. Subsequently, the Plaintiff completed the work but alleges that the Defendant failed to make the agreed-upon payments, thereby constituting a breach of contract.
The Defendant countered the claims by arguing that the Plaintiff either failed to meet the standards as outlined in the contract or did not complete the work satisfactorily, citing defects and incomplete areas that were to be painted.
**Issues:**
1. Did the Defendant breach the contract by failing to make payments as stipulated?
2. Did the Plaintiff uphold its contractual obligations in terms of quality and timeliness of the work performed?
3. What damages, if any, are recoverable by either party?
**Holding:**
The court found [Specify Findings, e.g., whether the Plaintiff or Defendant was in breach of contract or if both parties had claims against each other].
**Reasoning:**
The court evaluated the contract terms, the evidence presented regarding the quality of work, and timeliness of completion. It considered communications between the parties and any documentation supporting claims of defects or payment disputes. The court ultimately ruled in favor of [the Plaintiff/Defendant], notably addressing the reasons for the ruling in relation to established contract law principles.
**Conclusion:**
The court awarded [specify any damages or relief granted, such as monetary compensation, enforcement of contract terms, etc.]. This case serves as a precedent regarding the enforcement of painting service contracts and underscores the importance of clear communication and detailed agreements in service relationships.
**Note:** For complete details of the ruling, including specific damages awarded and legal precedent cited, refer to the official court documents associated with Docket Number 3087309.
---
This summary is a fictional construction as there is no public record of such a case under the provided docket number up to October 2023. Please ensure to verify with actual court records for real case proceedings.