Legal Case Summary

Zelaya v. The Coca Cola Company


Date Argued: Mon Nov 14 2005
Case Number: 04-15030
Docket Number: 7857365
Judges:Farris, Tashima, Callahan
Duration: 29 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Zelaya v. The Coca-Cola Company, Docket No. 7857365** **Court:** [Court Name, e.g., United States District Court] **Date:** [Date of Decision or Filing] **Judge:** [Judge's Name] **Parties:** - **Plaintiff:** Zelaya - **Defendant:** The Coca-Cola Company **Background:** The case of Zelaya v. The Coca-Cola Company involves the plaintiff, Zelaya, who initiated a legal action against the defendant, The Coca-Cola Company. The specifics of the grievance include allegations related to [briefly describe the nature of the claim such as employment discrimination, wrongful termination, product liability, etc.]. Zelaya claims to have suffered [describe the type of harm or damages sought, e.g., financial loss, emotional distress, etc.] as a result of The Coca-Cola Company’s actions (or inactions). **Legal Issues:** The central legal issues in this case pertain to [list any specific laws or regulations implicated in the case, such as labor laws, federal statutes, state laws, etc.]. The plaintiff argues that [summarize the legal arguments made by the plaintiff], while the defendant contends that [summarize the legal arguments made by the defendant]. **Arguments:** - **Plaintiff’s Argument:** Zelaya asserts that the actions of The Coca-Cola Company were [describe plaintiff's perspective, e.g., discriminatory, negligent, etc.], leading to detrimental effects on Zelaya’s [career, health, etc.]. The plaintiff seeks [state the relief sought, such as monetary damages, reinstatement, etc.]. - **Defendant’s Argument:** The Coca-Cola Company denies the allegations, arguing that [summarize the defense's arguments]. They maintain that [explain any affirmative defenses, if applicable]. **Outcome:** [Please insert the result of the case, whether it was a dismissal, settlement, verdict in favor of the plaintiff/defendant, etc. Include terms of any settlement, if applicable.] **Significance:** This case is significant as it touches upon [explain broader implications or legal principles involved, such as corporate responsibility, employee rights, product safety, etc.]. The ruling could impact [mention any potential impact on future cases, industry practices, etc.]. **Next Steps:** Following the ruling, the parties may consider [discuss any further legal actions, appeals, or compliance requirements that might follow]. **Note:** The information contained in this summary is a general overview of the case Zelaya v. The Coca-Cola Company and should not be construed as legal advice. For specific legal inquiries, consulting a qualified attorney is recommended. --- *Please replace placeholders with relevant information as applicable to the case specifics.*

Zelaya v. The Coca Cola Company


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available