Legal Case Summary

Zimmerman v. City of Oakland


Date Argued: Tue Feb 10 2004
Case Number: 03-15067
Docket Number: 7860362
Judges:Goodwin, Tashima, Clifton
Duration: 44 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Zimmerman v. City of Oakland** **Docket Number:** 7860362 **Court:** [Specific court name, if applicable] **Date:** [Date of the decision, if available] **Overview:** Zimmerman v. City of Oakland involves a legal dispute where the plaintiff, Zimmerman, challenges the actions of the City of Oakland. The case revolves around issues of municipal governance, public policy, and potential violations of rights or regulations. **Facts:** - Plaintiff Zimmerman alleges that the City of Oakland failed to adhere to certain regulations or laws that affected the community or property interests. - Specific details about the incidents leading to the dispute include [briefly outline the core events or practices by the City that led to the complaint]. - Zimmerman seeks relief from the court by requesting [monetary damages, injunctive relief, specific performance, etc.]. **Legal Issues:** The key legal issues presented in this case include: 1. Whether the City of Oakland acted within its legal authority regarding [specific action taken by the city]. 2. Whether Zimmerman’s rights were violated under [specific statutes or constitutional provisions]. 3. The extent of municipal liability in circumstances where [insert relevant context]. **Court’s Analysis:** - The court evaluated the statutory and constitutional frameworks applicable to municipal actions. - Key arguments from both sides were addressed, with the court analyzing evidence and precedents relevant to municipal liability and the rights claimed by Zimmerman. - The court considered [any significant legal principles, precedents, or factual determinations that were crucial to the decision]. **Conclusion:** While the exact ruling of the court remains undisclosed in this summary, the case highlights important issues regarding municipal authority and individual rights. The outcome may set a precedent impacting future disputes involving city governance and citizen rights. Further developments in the case may provide clarity on municipal obligations and the enforcement of civic regulations. **Note:** The details of the court's decision and specific arguments might vary, and any legal outcomes should be verified through official court records or legal databases for accuracy and completeness.

Zimmerman v. City of Oakland


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available